Thanks for the reply AO.

First off, just because scientific information does not come directly from some scientific website, whatever that might be, does not necessarily or automatically negate that informations validity or credibility. Also, what scientific website would list this information anyway? That would certainly seem to undermine the years of hard work and research being at stake if any information would come to light that may contradict the long standing ( 150-200 yrs.) of evolutionary thought. I can imagine just like in Christianity, ones whole belief system could be tied up in this issue. Far be it there could be a chance of that crumbling down based on opposing relevent information.Darwinism has some very interesting challenges to its doctrine whether they will be acknowledged here on this forum or not. In the spirit of an open mind would it be fair to say technology has come a long way since his ideas first came to light? Is it possible some of Darwins conclusions may have been incorrect because of a lack of that technology? Did you not say something like science is always changing based on new information. Are not some, if not most of the changes in scientific thought due to ever improving technology that reveals flaws in an older system of thought? You claim the information I linked to is invalid because it happens to come off a website that has a Christian perspective? I think it brings up interesting thought provoking logical alternatives to a possibly outdated incomplete theory.
Further, your introduction of the last post you made sure smaks of a good old political smear campain tactic. Would you agree?
I could just as easily discredit your own sources a few posts up.
http://www.straightdope.com/faq/officialfaq.html
http://www.bidstrup.com/Resume.doc

You surprise me AO, especially since you chastised Dorkus for apparently not knowing his sources. Are these the kind of places you regularly resource information from? Really,what credentials does Scott Bidstrup have in regard to his preported vast knowledge of Christianity and the bible?

Who is Cecil Adams? Apparently the smartest man on earth according to that web page. Not very convincing.

Hows a bought leaving the smear campain tactics out and see what we come up with?
I wouldn't pretend to know as much about science as you seem to know, but I'm not a complete idiot either.