Tell me some key tenets of Intelligent Design without once referring to evolution. Let's hear some verifiable scientific predictions. It's my opinion that ID merely states the obvious, just as you have. Namely, that the theory of evolution through natural selection is an incomplete explanation of the origin of life or of current species. That is not a hypothesis in any scientific sense of the word--it is merely stating a truism, since no one claims that evolution is complete or explains everything--so again, tell me what constructive claims ID makes in order to attempt to interpret speciation or biogenesis without referring to a creator (because that would make you a creationist) or to evolution (because it does not assert to explain it all). I really am curious, because I have had this conversation with many people, and haven't heard a single one.