First, take a look at the about us page from both of mixandburn's links.

They are not a scientific organization--they are a religious conversion tool.

Second, their claims have already been addressed by my links throughout this thread. They also pull the dirty trick of quoting scientists, including Darwin, out of context in order to make them appear to be doubting their own work. One good example is the quote on the eye, about which I posted an entire quotation of Darwin's earlier. They do exactly what the link I posted accused of.

Third, that article has no author listed, and is written in a style so cleverly contrived as to give the appearance of objectivity. It is absolutely not objective, but attempts to use the Bible as scientific evidence disproving Big Bang theory as well as Evolution.

Here's an example of their scientific rigor:

 Quote:
Over time, I found the evidence of the resurrection of Jesus Christ to be some of the most solid and attested facts of antiquity. After rising from the dead and before ascending back into heaven, Jesus was seen by hundreds of eyewitnesses, many of whom died unflinchingly for their testimony.
The notion of Irreducible Complexity is a study in the misapplication of logic. A typical claim goes: Such and such mechanism is a perfect working machine. For it to function, all its parts must have been generated at once, already functioning, or else the machine wouldn't work at all. Take a car's engine for example--without spark plugs, it wouldn't do anything, so it couldn't have evolved from separate parts.

This completely ignores the fact that simpler systems exist, and have been documented. In the case of the eye, simple light detecting cells gave way to mucous-covered motion detecting cells. Then the mucous led to a fixed lens, and after millions of years we got the magnificent mechanism of moden human vision. Creationists would have you believe that evolution says some creature existed with a lens, occular musculature, and a retina but no iris, then suddenly--bam, an iris "mutated" out of nothing and here we are.

Creationists prey on the uneducated and attempt to supplant the desire for knowledge with a faith in Jesus Christ.

This does not mean that belief in Christ is erroneous. It's just that belief in his teachings cannot replace empirical, repeatable, testable evidence.

I'm still waiting for the evidence of so-called Intelligent Design. So far all I've seen is evidence of the need for further research in evolution--which I don't deny, and in fact encourage.

Intelligent design was created as a front for Christian fundamentalist creationism, and I'm glad mixandburn is proving this through his links.