You're right, that is silly, probably useless as well, unlike the prevention of legal voters from excersizing their right by claiming they are felons.
I believe wisconcin was close enough that they had to do recounts as well. It was a few days before the real outcome of the election in WI.
But that was'nt relaly the point. The point is that for every example you can show of the right playing nasty, there is an example of the left doing so as well.
I must say it is rather sad that democrats need to rely on the votes of convicted felons to win ellections.
though, let's say Saddam had had them. What was preventing him from using them on us?
I dont think so. Saddam always thought he could tough it out. He knew the UN was opposed to the invasion, and he believed that if he could live through it he could return to power and he would have the UN on his side, at least in that respect.
however, if he used WMD's on us during our invasion it would have proven us correct and the UN would have turned thier backs on him, probably lending the US more aid.
I mean think about where this guy was found. Across the river from his own palace. He always thought he or at least his sons were going to return to power.
Nick , you need to start your own forum, seems like you live for this type endless debate thread which has nothing to do whis website.
Might I suggest
www.discussanything.com it's just the place a nutty liberal like nick could have a blast.
I, being the right wing zealot that I am post there often.
Previous Topic
Index
